TheHouseandSenate.com is a free, service-based website built by an Executive Assistant at the Oklahoma State Capitol. This service was built to streamline state government and make it easy to access the same resources we use every day.

"My name is Maggie. I am a teacher and I will be doing a history lesson on 12/12 about American government, specifically the Judicial branch. I was looking into teaching resources for it and I came across your website. I have got to say, it's great! You have so much great information here and your website layout is so easy to use. I just can't tell you how much I love it!"

"Every year during legislative session, I am reminded how grateful I am for this website and the detail involved. It is a be-all and end-all resource for me and I just wanted to tell you how much you are appreciated for providing it." - Executive Assistant, OK Center for the Advancement of Science

"If you have an interest in your state government and need reliable information fast … in Oklahoma, this is the website to use. This should be one of your 'go to sites'."

"We can tell you that the Oklahoma Reporter and the NABRAUSA use this website to help in data research for articles and investigations. It has saved us thousands of hours work … and we always find the information to be just what the site claims: a link for public information."

"I own a web hosting company and I am the political analyst in Oklahoma, Arkansas and Texas -- I am very impressed with your site. Apparently my staff has used your site for some time, and as is often the case, I am the last to know about such a resource. Keep up the good work!"

Welcome to theHouseandSenate.com - a website by Grace McMillan. Like this website? See more web design at GraceMcMillan.com.

2016 State Questions

Issues To Be Referred to Oklahoma Voters
for Approval or Rejection at the 2016 Elections

See also the list of State Questions compiled by the Secretary of State at
https://www.sos.ok.gov/gov/questions.aspx

Issue: Death Penalty
State Question 776
Legislative Referendum 367
Originating Legislation: SJR 31 (2015)
Principal Authors: Senator Anthony Sykes, Representative Mike Christian
Election Date: November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by the Attorney General):

This measure adds a new section to the Oklahoma Constitution, Section 9A of Article 2.  The new Section deals with the death penalty.  The Section establishes State constitutional mandates relating to the death penalty and methods of execution.  Under these constitutional requirements:

  • The Legislature is expressly empowered to designate any method of execution not prohibited by the United States Constitution.
  • Death sentences shall not be reduced because a method of execution is ruled to be invalid.
  • When an execution method is declared invalid, the death penalty imposed shall remain in force until it can be carried out using any valid execution method, and
  • The imposition of a death penalty under Oklahoma law—as distinguished from a method of execution—shall not be deemed to be or constitute the infliction of cruel or unusual punishment under Oklahoma’s Constitution, nor to contravene any provision of the Oklahoma Constitution.

Issue: Right to Engage in Farming and Ranching
State Question 777
Legislative Referendum 368
Originating Legislation:  HJR 1012 (2015)
Principal Authors:  Senator Jason Smalley, Representative Scott Biggs
Election Date: November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by the Attorney General):

This measure adds Section 38 to Article II of the Oklahoma Constitution.

The new Section creates state constitutional rights.  It creates the following guaranteed rights to engage in farming and ranching:

  • The right to make use of agricultural technology,
  • The right to make use of livestock procedures, and
  • The right to make use of ranching practices.

These constitutional rights receive extra protection under this measure that not all constitutional rights receive.  This extra protection is a limit on lawmakers’ ability to interfere with the exercise of these rights.  Under this extra protection, no law can interfere with these rights, unless the law is justified by a compelling state interest—a clearly defined state interest of the highest order.  Additionally, the law must be necessary to serve that compelling state interest.

The measure—and the protections identified above—do not apply to and do not impact state laws related to:

  • Trespass,
  • Eminent domain,
  • Dominance of mineral interests,
  • Easements,
  • Right of way or other property rights, and
  • Any state statutes and political subdivision ordinances enacted before December 31, 2014.

Issue: Public Education Funding
State Question 779
Initiative Petition 403
Election Date: November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by the Oklahoma Supreme Court):

This measure adds a new Article to the Oklahoma Constitution.  The article creates a limited purpose fund to increase funding for public education.  It increases State sales and use taxes by one cent per dollar to provide revenue for the fund.  The revenue to be used for public education shall be allocated:  69.50% for common school districts, 19.25% for the institutions under the authority of the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 3.25% for the Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education, and 8% for the State Department of Education.  It requires teacher salary increases funded by this measure raise teacher salaries by at least $5,000 over the salaries paid in the year prior to adoption of this measure.  It requires an annual audit of school districts’ use of monies.   It prohibits school districts’ use of these funds for increasing superintendents’ salaries or adding superintendent positions.  It requires that monies from the fund not supplant or replace other educational funding.  If the Oklahoma Board of Equalization determines funding has been replaced, the Legislature may not make any appropriations until the amount of replaced funding is returned to the fund.  The article takes effect on July 1 after its passage.

Issue:  Criminal Sentences for Certain Property and Drug Offenses
State Question 780
Initiative Petition 404
Election Date:  November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by the Oklahoma Supreme Court):

This measure amends existing Oklahoma laws and would change the classification of certain drug possession and property crimes from felony to misdemeanor.  It would make possession of a limited quantity of drugs a misdemeanor.  The amendment also changes the classification of certain drug possession crimes which are currently considered felonies and cases where the defendant has a prior drug possession conviction.  The proposed amendment would reclassify these drug possession cases as misdemeanors.  The amendment would increase the threshold dollar amount used for determining whether certain property crimes are considered a felony or misdemeanor.  Currently, the threshold is $500.  The amendment would increase the amount to $1000.  Property crimes covered by this change include; false declaration of a pawn ticket, embezzlement, larceny, grand larceny, theft, receiving or concealing stolen property, taking domesticated fish or game, fraud, forgery, counterfeiting, or issuing bogus checks.  This measure would become effective July 1, 2017.

Issue:  County Community Safety Investment Fund
State Question 781
Initiative Petition 405
Election Date:  November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by the Oklahoma Supreme Court):

This measure creates the County Community Safety Investment Fund, only if voters approve State Question 780, the Oklahoma Smart Justice Reform Act.  This measure would create a fund, consisting of any calculated savings or averted costs that accrued to the State from the implementation of the Oklahoma Smart Justice Reform Act in reclassifying certain property crimes and drug possession as misdemeanors.  The measure requires the Office of Management and Enterprise Services to use either actual data or its best estimate to determine how much money was saved on a yearly basis.  The amount determined to be saved must be deposited into the Fund and distributed to counties in proportion to their population to provide community rehabilitative programs, such as mental health and substance abuse services.  This measure will not become effective if State Question 780, the Oklahoma Smart Justice Reform Act, is not approved by the people.  The measure will become effective on July 1 immediately following its passage.

Issue: Repeal of Prohibition on Public Expenditure and Property Use for Religious Purposes
State Question 790
Legislative Referendum 369
Originating Legislation:  SJR 72 (2016)
Principal Authors:  Senator Rob Standridge, Representative John Paul Jordan
Election Date: November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by the Attorney General):

This measure would remove Article 2, Section 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution, which prohibits the government from using public money or property for the direct or indirect benefit of any religion or religious institution.  Article 2, Section 5 has been interpreted by the Oklahoma courts as requiring the removal of a Ten Commandments monument from the grounds of the State Capitol.  If this measure repealing Article 2, Section 5 is passed, the government would still be required to comply with the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, which is a similar constitutional provision that prevents the government from endorsing a religion or becoming overly involved with religion.

Issue: Alcoholic Beverage Regulation
State Question 792
Legislative Referendum 370
Originating Legislation:  SJR 68 (2016)
Principal Authors:  Senator Clark Jolley, Representative Glen Mulready
Election Date: November 8, 2016
Ballot Title (as re-written by by the Attorney General):

This measure repeals Article 28 of the Oklahoma Constitution and restructures the laws governing alcoholic beverages through a new Article 28A and other laws the Legislature will create if the measure passes. The new Article 28A provides that with exceptions, a person or company can have an ownership interest in only one area of the alcoholic beverage business-manufacturing, wholesaling, or retailing. Some restrictions apply to the sales of manufacturers, brewers, winemakers, and wholesalers. Subject to limitations, the Legislature may authorize direct shipments to consumers of wine. Retail locations like grocery stores may sell wine and beer. Liquor stores may sell products other than alcoholic beverages in limited amounts. The Legislature must create licenses for retail locations, liquor stores, and places serving alcoholic beverages and may create other licenses. Certain licensees must meet residency requirements. Felons cannot be licensees. The Legislature must designate days and hours when alcoholic beverages may be sold and may impose taxes on sales. Municipalities may levy an occupation tax. If authorized, a state lodge may sell individual alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption but no other state involvement in the alcoholic beverage business is allowed. With one exception, the measure will take effect October 1, 2018.

Prepared by:
The Oklahoma State Senate, Senate Staff
Senator Brian Bingman, President Pro Tempore

By |August 25th, 2016|State Questions|0 Comments

2014 State Questions on the Ballot

Copied and pasted directly from: http://www.ok.gov/elections/Election_Info/State_Question_info.html.

Current State Questions (2014)

Following are ballot titles for State Questions currently on the ballot for the Nov. 4 General Election. For more information, refer to the Secretary of State’s website.

SQ 769
THE GIST OF THE PROPOSITION IS AS FOLLOWS:
This measure amends Section 12 of Article 2 of the Oklahoma Constitution. That Section currently imposes limits on an individual simultaneously holding certain government offices. The amendment would permit those serving in state offices of trust or profit to also hold certain military positions. Holders of an Oklahoma office of trust or profit who currently can not simultaneously hold certain military positions, include:

  • Legislators;
  • State Judges;
  • District Attorneys;
  • Statewide elected officials, such as the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General and Treasurer;
  • Members of State Boards, Agencies and Commissions, and
  • Many County Officers.

The measure creates a state constitutional right permitting holders of Oklahoma offices of trust or profit to also serve and be called to active duty or active service in the following military positions:

  1. An Officer or Enlisted Member of
  • The National Guard,
  • The National Guard Reserve,
  • The Oklahoma State Guard, or
  • Any other active militia or military force organized under State law;
  1. An Officer of the Officers Reserve Corps of the United States or
  2. An Enlisted Member of the Organized Reserves of the United States.

The Measure empowers the Legislature to enact laws to implement the amended Section.

SQ 770
THE GIST OF THE PROPOSITION IS AS FOLLOWS:
This measure amends the Oklahoma Constitution. It amends Section 8E of Article 10. This section provides a homestead exemption to certain qualifying disabled veterans. It also provides a homestead exemption to the surviving spouse of qualifying disabled veterans. This measure would allow either the veteran or his or her surviving spouse to sell the homestead but acquire another homestead property in the same calendar year. The exemption would apply to the newly acquired homestead property to the same extent as the original exemption for the homestead property that was sold.

SQ 771
THE GIST OF THE PROPOSITION IS AS FOLLOWS:
This measure amends the Oklahoma Constitution. It would add a new Section 8F to Article 10. It would create a homestead exemption for the surviving spouse of military personnel who die in the line of duty. The United States Department of Defense or the applicable branch of the United States military would make the determination regarding whether the person engaged in military service died while in the line of duty. It would provide the surviving spouse of such person with a one hundred percent (100%) exemption for the fair cash value of the homestead until the surviving spouse remarried. This measure would allow the surviving spouse to sell the homestead, but acquire another homestead property in the same calendar year. The exemption would apply to the newly acquired homestead property to the same extent as the original exemption for the homestead property that was sold. The exemption would apply beginning in calendar year 2015. The exemption would also apply for the 2014 calendar year if the surviving spouse meets applicable requirements.

By |October 12th, 2014|Legislation, Quick Reference, State Questions|0 Comments